Tweet Detail
Bob RaeCourts have ruled "freedom of association" equals "collective bargaining"... maybe the same principle applies to prairie farmers and wheat2011 Dec 14, 10:28
Replies to this Tweet
nexbridge@bobraeMP Could the CWB be entitled to union-rights by virtue of its charter, constitution, membership?Dec 14, 2011 10:30 am
pertian@bobraeMP anything preventing farmers from starting a collective, a private CWB?Dec 14, 2011 10:30 am
RunnertheFirst@bobraeMP Wheat board still exists as an option for prairie farmers just not as the only option.Dec 14, 2011 10:31 am
tailormann@bobraeMP I am on your side, but there's a difference between 'freedom of association' and 'forced association'. Keep fighting though!Dec 14, 2011 10:31 am
markbratrud@bobraeMP You guys are ruining any chance of a Voluntary #cwb by dragging this on. Actual grain producers have just about seen enough!Dec 14, 2011 10:38 am
stateofthecity@bobraeMP No comparison between legislated regional monopoly and free collective bargaining. Why pretend there is one?Dec 14, 2011 10:40 am
der_junker@bobraeMP they're not destroying the board, right? Just its monopoly. #monopolyisntfairDec 14, 2011 10:41 am
universenme@bobraeMP Sad, Majority Gov in Canada squander their mandate on trivial matters, completely ignoring the will of the people, why is that?Dec 14, 2011 10:51 am
fiveare@bobraeMP what about freedom *from* association? Is that not just as important? Nobody is impeding a voluntary wheat board.Dec 14, 2011 11:08 am
Jasonphilp@bobraeMP let me explain the difference between have to and get to. If you force prairie farmers u must force all farmers. Liberty for allDec 14, 2011 1:17 pmBlueCanadaRedUS@bobraeMP Freedom of association must include freedom not to associate.Dec 14, 2011 1:50 pm
Liked By
- anonymous > Dec 14, 2011 11:03 am

follow